baby furs

[icy wolf]

Let me start of by saying iam not a baby fur and i do not hate baby fur i find them to be cool and iam fine with them, the only thing iam not fine with is the adult art in involvin baby furs .

My question is why do some people think that baby fur are the worst part of the fandom ? i see nothing wrong with them its what those furs like. 

[___]

Well, if you saw some of the horror stories people have about them at the cons, you'd know.
(People dropping full diapers in the lobby of a hotel...)
But personally, there are stupid people everywhere, so its not fair to judge someone based on their preferences like that.

That, and they liken the yiffy part of babyfur to pedophilia, like non-furs liken regular yiff to bestiality/zoophillia.

[Count of Cutesy]

On DeviantArt, I'm watching a guy named TaviMunk who draws some really cute BabyFurs. Fortunately, nothing remotely gross on his page.

Personally, I don't pay much attention to any kind of Furry porn, so I don't notice any pornographic BabyFur pictures.

[Self-sain]

I'm not sure what kind of advice your seeking but.. To each his own. That's how I see it. Back in the 1800's 20-30 year old mean married little girls around the age of 12. In ancient Greece, the wealthy had "intament" relationships with their animals. Society now deems those as "wrong" and "inappropriate"; who's to say x amount of years form now people will look down upon cougars or marriage. My point is, every one is subject to judgement, no one is perfect, society is always changing, who's to say what is right and wrong, who's to say you should judge. 

[icy wolf]

ive meet a few baby furs at a con, the seemed nice non of them had a fur suit though. this is the first time i have heard about those stroys about them but still they are still part of the fandom as much as any other fur is.

[Puncia]

Self-sain forgot to mention that Cupid is the symbol of the sexual relationship between a young boy and his older tutor (30-40 years old probably) in ancient Greece, which was totally normal and usually also required and a sign of respect. Think of that next time your kid comes with a drawing of Cupid from school.

Anyway.
Everyone would hate someone that places a full diaper in the lobby. Trolls are trolls, they are not to be fed under no circumstances.
And I suppose there are many that would compare it to pedophilia, which is mostly frowned upon. Me included.
Also, haven't we all seen these overweight, middle-aged men in huuuge diapers, being fed by some woman?

I have nothing personal against or for baby furries. I just answered the question at the top.

[Self-sain]

I think being a pedophile is wrong (but then again bias view seeing how society influenced me), but I just think we worry about others to much. If no one is being hurt (unless they want to ) then I don't think its any of my business, with that being said, please don't flop it in my face, aka dirty diaper lobby thing.

Also on that note, I think I want to indulge my self in ancient Greece nonsense, so much knowledge there.

[ArcticSkyWolf]

the worst part is probably when people think furries are pedos in fursuits that "yiff" all day. a.k.a. misconception garbage. So the worst part is if people only know the bad parts of the whole fandom. Also, zoophilia and beastiality is probably the worst in my book.

the porn part isn't the worst because it's part of Art in General.

I don't know any baby furs yet...