Personally, I don't see where you guys were pulling the sexual stuff from, especially with the definition. The definition just says someone who roleplays as an animal or anthropomorphic being. It is vague, but I know there's a roleplay section on this forum where people participate and there's no sexual anything going on. So technically, anyone who participates in that section can be considered furry. The only thing that was directed towards sexual fetishes, I feel, is the question about legality and the question about the consenting adults. I don't see the problem with many of the other questions, honestly. Once you're a member of FurAffinity, you see how disgusting furries can be with the fetishes they allow on that site. They literally have things ranging from pedophilia to other things none of you should know about.
Lol. Now having said all of this, I am a scaly and I do participate in hanging around furries, but I suppose I'm one of the mildest forms of one given my nature. Being furry is not normal, especially when you're clumped into a pile of people who dress up in animal suits and have sex and people who condone pedophilia. That's not to say EVERYONE is like that, because as with every fandom there are extremists, but until people can give a proper image that not all furries are bad, we're stuck with that.