Everyone versus everyone! (Current Record: 255)

[Ventus Fall]

20

Yay, my philosophy lectures taught me something!
And pff, I want you to board the next train somehow! .-.

[Bricket]

21
that would require a third person

[Ventus Fall]

22

True, and we can't rely on Razot here ^^;

[Bricket]

23
correct.
So, what do you think of Kant?

[Ventus Fall]

24

Kant? As in an edge, or another philoshoper? x3

[Bricket]

25
the philosopher 

[Ventus Fall]

26

The odd thing is, we never got to study him in the lectures I had, but... from what I have read about him, I find him interesting.
Any you are most interested in?

[Bricket]

27
Max Stirner and his philosophy of voluntarily Egoïsm

[Ventus Fall]

28

Now that's a name I haven't heard of before, but perhaps his ideas I might have. Care to tell more?

[Bricket]

29
In a short recap: he says that everyone whill thrive if we all go for our own good.
This means that everyone should be an egoïst and selfish and fight for himself.
He shouldn't feel bonded to moral laws or social norms to get what he wants.

His idea is that when you have a group of 10 people with 1 boss, those 10 people will work to make the boss better. But if you have a group of 10 people with just clear communication they will all work for themselves to get the best possible results for themselves thus it will be better for all 10.

Also, I give you the honour to board tram 3

[Ventus Fall]

30

Why thank you!

Hmm, well that is very interesting...

[Bricket]

31
It really is because the system will in the end self-regulate itself

[Ventus Fall]

32

Well, that is indeed the philosophy.
But it could lead also to the other way around, where there is no order and people will not survive. Or communication will work out, but there will still need to be some form of leadership. Maybe a group of 10 is do-able, although experience with working in teams show that sometimes people are too stubborn to work together, and everything thinks what they're doing is best, sometimes leading to the demise of the group, individuals, or people/humanity in general. What I'm saying: Sometimes even when life depends on it, people can refuse to work or even communicate together. Even if the only other person left is the one you might hate.
However, a group of 10 people who have similar interests, who probably like each other from the start, might be different. Eh *shrugs* Hard to think now.

[Bricket]

33
Well if the groups is not bound to moral laws they can just simply get rid of the factor that holds them back

[Ventus Fall]

34

But if people are born with a sense of morale and judgement, it would be near impossible?
In fact, shouldn't it be morale to strive them to communicate together? Otherwise there wouldn't be communication if there is no moral motivation to do so?

And look at that, we're getting pretty high!