1
hmmm
"we" is relative here.
Let's say you said 5-15 numbers (let's take 15) and others have said 40 numbers (which is an huge overestimation btw) that would mean that you said 5.88% of the record, the others said 15.69% of the record.
There was however a small error made by fuexline and me (around 136) which made us count a number double. If we say that we basically said an even about of number, that brings the share of the count to 39.22%. However, if we say that Fuexline threw away a number and thus saying he counted a number more than me then that means that I said 99 numbers and Fuexline 101 which brings the percentage to 39.61% for fuexline and just 38.82% for me.
The numbers are listed here:
Version 1 (mistake seen as an irregularity)
Fuexline (100) 39.22%
Bricket (100) 39.22%
Others (40) 15.69%
Ventus (15) 5.88%
Version 2 (counting the mistake as a double count for Fuexline)
Fuexline (101) 39.61%
Bricket (99) 38.82%
Others (40) 15.69%
Ventus (15) 5.88%
It is correct that the record is a matter of saying "we" did it, but as I see it: I might have started the count and might have said 188 but Fuexline has actually done the most here so if there is one that should claim it, it's him.