We may have a lot of different beliefs for a lot of different things, but a lot of us have a general rule or structure to follow. These philosophical structures can occassionally be very important, so my question to you TFF users is what is your philosophy, how did it come to be and how has it evolved over time?
I started off not having much of a philosophy on life, I just didn't really think of things that much. Then, when I was in about 7th grade, my brother taught me of Einsteins theory of special relativity. It took a little bit for me to grasp, but once I understood it, it became eye opening. Although the scientific belief is not so much relevant to how my beliefs evolved, I started believing in it philosophically. I believed that all opinions and all observations were subjective, that NOTHING was objective, not mathematics or the constant speed of light (which is in direct conflict with the original theory), I believed that as humans have minds they have bias and thus can believe what ever they want to and that would be a truth to them.
As time went on I thought a lot more about the theory, debated a lot more people and became a bit more rigorous with the belief. I got rid of the idea that NOTHING was true and all was subjective, but I instead defined a new class of truth, a "relative truth", in which something can be said to be true to a certain group of people if most people within that group believe it. This meant that things like Mathematics and Science could sustain some objectivity because they could be seen as "relatively true". But there were still a lot of holes in the theory and it was only when I discovered set theory that I crafted the theory to what I believe today.
My current belief in relativity is a lot more mathematical in nature. It assigns differing reference frames into sets, so what you become interested in is not what is ACTUALLY true, but what is true for a particular set and what set it is true for. This also underlies the value of science and mathematics, because it can be said that was in ACTUALLY true is true for all sets and mathematics and science tends to attempt to define things that are true for as many reference frames as possible. The set application is important because it emphasis what community you're interested in, in terms of discovering a truth. For example, Is slavery bad? In ACTUALITY there is no known answer to that, but we can say that to the set of all humans, most humans find slavery bad so therefore, it is bad relative to humanity. It helps define usefulness out of truths, rather than worrying about what is actually occurring, it worries about what is true for the reference frames you are interested in.
There are still some holes to poke out, but I'm getting closer.
So what is your theory of life?